Election of Lincoln and Civil War Essay examples -- history

Election of capital of Nebraska and Civil WarHow did the choice of Lincoln to president in 1860 lead to civil fight in the unite States of America? Essay In 1860 Abraham Lincoln was elected as president of the United States of America, the repercussions of which led to civil war. However it was not unless Lincolns election that led to civil war but also the slavery overturn between the northern and federationern states and the state of the economy in the United States. Together with the election of Lincoln these caused a split, both politically and ideologically, between the northwestern and South states which manifested into what is now refereed to as the American Civil War. When Lincoln won the 1860 election it was not by a majority vote. As stated by the historian Neville he in fact won less than 40 percent of popular votes. However because the American election system is based on the college votes system (where each state is worth a certain number of points and if a candi date wins the majority of votes in that state he wins all the points for that state, no matter of how much he wins by. To win the entire election a candidate must win the most amount of points) he was subject to win the election with a minority of votes. Lincoln won all the states in the north and in the west which, because of their high population, were worth the most points. This election caused the civil war because of what the southern states, the Confederate, perceived Lincoln to be. He was thought to be an abolitionist, meaning a person who wishes to abolish slavery completely. In fact Lincoln only wished to stop the spread of slavery, not to abolish it completely. He had no intention of changing the established social order in the south. Historian J. J. Cosgrove sees Lincolns election as the straw that broke the camels back. He claims in his book, co-written with J. K. Kreiss, Two Centuries that the civil war can be put down to fivesome causes slavery political collapse th at eliminated compromise sectional economic rivalry Southern nationalism and the effect of fractional minorities such as abolitionists. This can be summed up as a rift between the north and south states. A rift between the north and the south had been present since the late 18th centaury. It began with the industrial revolution, which saw the northern states prosper. The north changed industries from fa... ...eadership of the democrats, believed in popular sovereignty ie the population of a state choosing for itself on the matter of slavery. The other extremity also aiming to rule the democrats was Breckinbridge, who believed in slavery being permitted in all states. The democrat party split into the northern and southern democrats. Because of the split Lincoln was able to win the election, upon which the southern states succeeded from the union. In conclusion the election of Lincoln as president in 1860 caused a civil war because it was falsely perceived by the south that Lincol n would threaten the states constitutional right to slavery. This false idea was due to a rift between the northern and southern states in both an economic and ideological manner. That is the north was based on industry and generally was opposed to slavery. But the South was an agricultural society which ran on slavery and, due to Nat Turners Insurrection and John Browns stand at Harpers Ferry, was fearful of the norths involvement in the governing of states as well as being opposed to this on the basis of states rights. The election of Lincoln caused the south to succeed from the union causing civil war.